When Is an Information Security Control No Longer Relevant?
Short answer
B Evaluate whether the control directly supports a specific business function before determining its operational relevance.
Question
Key Takeaways
Tests alignment between security controls and business objectives, while trapping candidates who confuse technological obsolescence with functional irrelevance.
This CISM question explores how to determine when a security control loses its business value, with community consensus confirming that misalignment with business functions is the definitive indicator of irrelevance.
Common mistake: Option D is frequently chosen because outdated technology seems outdated, but CISM emphasizes that a control remains relevant as long as it addresses a current business requirement, regardless of the underlying tech.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
In CISM, security controls exist solely to mitigate risks that impact business objectives. When a control no longer supports a specific business function, it has lost its strategic purpose and becomes redundant. ISACA’s framework explicitly states that control effectiveness and relevance must be continuously evaluated against evolving business processes, making option B the definitive indicator.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A addresses financial optimization rather than operational relevance; a costly control may still be critical for compliance or risk avoidance. Option C reflects an organizational governance gap, not a technical or functional flaw in the control itself. Option D focuses on the underlying infrastructure, but legacy technology can still enforce valid security policies until properly replaced.
Community Comment Notes
Candidates like [1] and [4] correctly highlight that business function alignment is the core CISM principle. Comment [2] effectively counters the distractor by noting that older technology can still serve valid security purposes. Comment [5] reinforces that not all controls are technology-dependent, further validating why business alignment outweighs technical factors.
Official Reference
- https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/past-issues/2020/volume-6/understanding-information-security-controls
- https://www.isaca.org/credentialing/cism
These links open the official vendor documentation in a new tab.
Exam Strategy
Always evaluate CISM questions through a business-risk lens first. Before selecting a technical or financial option, ask whether the scenario directly impacts business objectives or compliance requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why isn't obsolete technology the best sign of irrelevance?
How do I know if a control is merely inefficient vs truly irrelevant?
Community Votes
83% of anonymous learners picked answer B. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Discussion 6 contributions
Compiled from public community threads and reader submissions, lightly edited for clarity. Handles and vote tallies are shown as recorded, and comments reflect the views of individual contributors.
From public community threads 6
-
bronay 👍 3 Answered BB. The control doesn't support Business functions
-
hargit 👍 1 Answered BNot D: technology could stil be used (e.g. old PC in control room etc)
-
1899f17 👍 1B. The control does not support a specific business function.
-
helg420 👍 1 Answered Balso agree with B. Not all controls are related to technology
-
MMK777 👍 1 Answered DNo longer relevant, which means it was relevant before
Show 1 more comment
-
Der_Phomas 👍 1Agree with B.
Reader comments & corrections
No reader corrections yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Related Analysis
Practice All CISM Questions
Access 400 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full CISM Practice Test →