Identifying Emerging Technology Threats
Short answer
C Conduct periodic risk assessments to identify changes in the threat landscape.
Question
Key Takeaways
This question tests the understanding that a formal risk assessment process is the primary mechanism for managers to detect environmental changes, rather than relying on ad-hoc external advice.
Identifying changes in the threat landscape due to emerging technologies is best achieved through periodic risk assessments. Community consensus favors this systematic process over relying solely on external expert input.
Common mistake: Choosing A (Input from external experts) is a common error because emerging technologies imply a need for specialized knowledge, but CISM prioritizes the manager's internal assessment process.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Periodic risk assessments are the foundational tool for an information security manager to identify and evaluate changes in the threat landscape. This process forces a regular review of assets, threats, and vulnerabilities, ensuring that risks from emerging technologies are systematically identified and quantified within the organization's context. It aligns with the CISM principle that risk management is a continuous, structured activity.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Input from external experts (Option A) provides valuable intelligence but is a data source rather than a management process. Annual security assessments (Option B) are too infrequent to keep pace with emerging technologies. Benchmarking against industry peers (Option D) offers comparison points but does not directly identify specific changes in the organization's unique threat landscape.
Community Comment Notes
There is a notable split in the community, with 67% of votes supporting Option C. While some commenters argued for Option A due to the specialized nature of emerging technologies, the majority and the most-liked comments (accumulating 6 likes vs 3 for A) reinforce that the risk assessment process is the manager's primary responsibility.
Official Reference
https://www.isaca.org/credentialing/cism
This link opens the official vendor documentation in a new tab.
Exam Strategy
When questions ask about identifying changes in the environment or threats, prioritize the systematic process (Risk Assessment) over specific data sources (Experts). The manager's role is to own the process.
Community Votes
67% of anonymous learners picked answer C. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Discussion 4 contributions
Compiled from public community threads and reader submissions, lightly edited for clarity. Handles and vote tallies are shown as recorded, and comments reflect the views of individual contributors.
From public community threads 4
-
koala_lay 👍 2 Answered AA. Input from external experts is the best way for an information security manager to identify changes in the threat landscape due to emerging technologies. External experts, such as cybersecurity researchers, industry analysts, and threat intelligence providers, have a broader and more up-to-date understanding of the evolving threat landscape, including the impact of new technologies. Annual security assessments and Periodic risk assessments are important, but they are more focused on the organization's current security posture and may not capture the rapidly changing threat landscape driven by emerging technologies.
-
Der_Phomas 👍 1 Answered AThreat Landscape are the keywords - so external experts are the BEST way
-
bronay 👍 4 Answered CC risk assessment
-
ServerBrain 👍 2 Answered CC. Periodic risk assessments
Reader comments & corrections
No reader corrections yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Related Analysis
Practice All CISM Questions
Access 400 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full CISM Practice Test →