IT Steering vs. Strategy Committee Roles in CISA
An organization has both an IT strategy committee and an IT steering committee. When reviewing the minutes of the IT steering committee, an IS auditor would expect to find that the committee:
Community Votes
100% of anonymous learners picked answer A. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
Tests the functional distinction between executive oversight bodies, where candidates often confuse tactical project resourcing with long-term strategic investment appraisal.
Distinguishes between IT steering and strategy committees in CISA governance frameworks. This page establishes that the steering committee focuses on tactical resource allocation and project execution.
Option B/C/D because candidates frequently conflate the steering committee’s operational mandate with the strategy committee’s portfolio and alignment responsibilities.
Community Discussion (5 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
The IT steering committee operates at a tactical level to oversee project execution and ensure operational continuity. According to ISACA governance frameworks, its primary mandate includes prioritizing initiatives, securing necessary funding, and assigning personnel to deliver agreed-upon outputs. Option A accurately reflects this responsibility, as the committee actively acquires and allocates resources to guarantee that projects remain viable and on schedule. This hands-on oversight distinguishes it from purely advisory or long-range planning bodies.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Options B, C, and D describe functions that belong to the IT strategy committee rather than the steering committee. Comparing risk and return profiles, measuring progress against strategic objectives, and evaluating how IT contributes to broader business goals are all forward-looking activities focused on portfolio management and alignment. These strategic assessments require board-level or executive-level deliberation outside the scope of day-to-day project steering. Conflating these duties creates a common governance structure error on certification exams.Community Comment Notes
Multiple examinees emphasize the clear division between execution-focused and vision-focused oversight groups. As RS66 noted, the steering committee directly manages project delivery and resource distribution to maintain momentum. PurpleParrot confirmed this hierarchy by stating 'option A as per CRM 100%', underscoring that tactical assignment supersedes strategic appraisal. This consistent breakdown reinforces why resource allocation remains the definitive steering committee function.Exam Strategy
When distinguishing governance committees, map 'steering' to execution, prioritization, and resource allocation, while reserving 'strategy' for long-term vision, investment appraisal, and alignment metrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is comparing risk and return not the steering committee's role?
Risk-return analysis belongs to the IT strategy committee, which evaluates long-term investment portfolios rather than day-to-day project execution.
Can the steering committee review strategic IT objectives?
No, tracking strategic objective achievement falls under the strategy committee's purview. The steering committee focuses on tactical delivery and resource assignment.
Related Analysis
Practice All CISA Questions
Access 400 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full CISA Practice Test →