Best Approach for Low-Risk Anomalies in CISA Audits
Which of the following is an IS auditor’s BEST approach when low-risk anomalies have been identified?
Community Votes
67% of anonymous learners picked answer B. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
Tests risk-based audit execution principles while trapping candidates who assume all findings require equal testing depth regardless of impact.
This CISA question evaluates how auditors should prioritize fieldwork when encountering low-risk anomalies, establishing that risk-based resource allocation takes precedence over exhaustive low-impact testing.
Candidates often select documenting the anomalies (A) because it feels universally correct, missing the strategic priority shift toward higher-risk areas emphasized in CISA methodology.
Community Discussion (3 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
B aligns with ISACA’s risk-based auditing framework, which mandates proportional allocation of audit effort. Low-risk anomalies do not warrant extensive follow-up testing when higher-impact control failures exist, making deprioritization the most efficient use of audit resources.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
A is technically required but fails as the best approach because it ignores risk prioritization and treats all findings equally. C misapplies audit planning timing, as workpaper data informs reporting rather than mid-engagement plan updates. D violates auditor independence by pushing management into remediation actions prematurely.Community Comment Notes
Learners correctly note that choosing B does not eliminate documentation requirements, and several highlight that option A is too generic to serve as the optimal strategy for risk-driven fieldwork [Comment 1][Comment 2].Official Reference
Exam Strategy
Always apply the risk-based lens first in CISA execution questions; if an option explicitly mentions reallocating effort away from low-impact items toward higher risks, it usually outperforms generic procedural steps.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why isn't documenting the anomaly (A) the best answer?
Documentation is mandatory but generic; CISA prioritizes risk-based resource allocation, making strategic deprioritization the superior fieldwork decision.
Should auditors report low-risk anomalies to management immediately?
No. Low-risk items are typically summarized in the final audit report without demanding urgent remediation, preserving auditor independence and management ownership.
Related Analysis
Practice All CISA Questions
Access 400 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full CISA Practice Test →