Which Business Case Component Best Indicates Vendor Due Diligence?
Which component of a business case provides the BEST indication that due diligence was performed during the vendor selection process?
Community Votes
56% of anonymous learners picked answer C. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
Tests understanding of business case components in vendor selection, with the common trap being confusing financial justification (cost-benefit) with comprehensive due diligence (alternative evaluation).
Evaluating vendor alternatives is a critical step in IT audit due diligence. This guide establishes why alternative solutions outperform cost-benefit analysis as the best indicator of thorough vendor selection.
Option D (Cost-benefit analysis) is frequently chosen because it appears financially rigorous, but it only validates the final choice rather than proving the full comparative research required for due diligence.
Community Discussion (4 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Evaluating alternative solutions is the strongest indicator of due diligence because it proves the organization systematically researched and compared multiple vendors against defined criteria. ISACA audit standards require decision-makers to document how various options stack up technically, operationally, and financially before recommending a path forward. This comparative documentation directly reflects the thoroughness expected in a formal vendor selection process. Without analyzing alternatives, a business case cannot demonstrate that the chosen vendor was truly vetted rather than arbitrarily selected.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Management approval merely authorizes the proposal and offers no insight into the research phase behind it. A problem statement clearly defines the business need but stops short of proving that external options were actually investigated. Cost-benefit analysis quantifies the financial viability of the recommended choice, yet it assumes alternatives were already identified. Relying solely on financial metrics validates the final decision rather than proving the comprehensive preparatory work that defines due diligence.Community Comment Notes
Many learners initially lean toward financial validation, but experienced candidates recognize that comparing multiple options covers broader risk and operational factors. As one contributor noted, this approach "implies the consideration and comparison of different vendors or solutions" across several dimensions. Others clarify that while financial justification supports the final recommendation, it does not replace the foundational research required to prove thorough preparation. The consensus reinforces that comprehensive option analysis is the definitive audit trail for due diligence.Exam Strategy
When answering CISA questions about due diligence, prioritize options that demonstrate systematic evaluation and comparison over those that only validate a single choice. Look for keywords like "alternatives," "options," or "comparative analysis" when the question emphasizes thorough preparation or risk assessment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why isn't cost-benefit analysis the best indicator?
Cost-benefit analysis only quantifies financial viability for the chosen option. It does not prove that other vendors were researched and compared, which is the true essence of due diligence.
How does ISACA define due diligence in vendor selection?
ISACA expects auditors to verify that organizations systematically evaluate multiple alternatives against technical, security, and operational criteria before committing resources.
Related Analysis
Practice All CISA Questions
Access 400 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full CISA Practice Test →