Resolving Inter-Region Asymmetric Routing with Transit Gateway Appliance Mode
A US-based company is expanding its business to Europe. A network engineer needs to extend the company's network infrastructure by setting up a new hub and spoke architecture in the eu-west-1 Region. The network engineer uses a transit gateway peering connection to connect the new resources in eu-west-1 to an existing environment in the us-east-1 Region. The hub and spoke architecture in each AWS Region includes an inspection VPC that uses AWS Network Firewall to centralize traffic inspection for each Region. To reduce costs, the network engineer decides to inspect inter-Region traffic by using the inspection VPC in the Region that originates the traffic. The network engineer configures the transit gateway route tables accordingly for each Region. When the network engineer tests the new architecture, communication within each Region works as expected. However, the network engineer finds that inter-Region communication is not working. The network engineer must resolve the inter-Region communication issue. Which solution will meet this requirement?
Community Insight
The core concept tested is AWS Transit Gateway appliance mode, which forces return traffic to traverse the same inspection appliance as outbound traffic, resolving the asymmetry that breaks stateful firewalls like Network Firewall.
This question addresses inter-Region communication failures in a hub-and-spoke architecture due to asymmetric routing through inspection VPCs. The correct solution involves enabling appliance mode on transit gateway attachments to ensure bidirectional traffic symmetry.
Many learners incorrectly select Option C, focusing on the conceptual problem of asymmetric routing without recognizing that Appliance Mode (Option D) is the specific technical mechanism required to fix it at the Transit Gateway level.
Community Discussion (4 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Correct answer: D — Enabling Appliance Mode ensures symmetric routing for stateful services. Enabling Appliance Mode on the Transit Gateway attachments attached to the inspection VPCs forces all return traffic to be routed back through the same attachment from which the original request originated. This resolves the asymmetric routing issue caused by the optimization of routes across Regions, ensuring that traffic inspected by AWS Network Firewall in the originating Region can be successfully returned via the same path.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A is incorrect because Transit Gateways do not support dynamic routing protocols like OSPF; they rely on static route propagation or BGP over Direct Connect. Option B is incorrect because AWS RAM is used for sharing resources across accounts, not for fixing routing logic or connectivity issues within a single account's multi-Region setup. Option C describes the desired outcome (preventing asymmetric routing) but does not provide the configuration step required to achieve it; Appliance Mode is the specific setting needed to enforce this behavior.Community Comment Notes
Community consensus strongly favors Option D, with multiple users noting that Appliance Mode is essential for maintaining traffic symmetry in inspection VPCs. One user highlighted that while intra-region traffic works, the inter-region failure points directly to the need for enforced return paths. Another comment clarified that Appliance Mode is the technical implementation of preventing asymmetric routing, distinguishing it from the general goal described in Option C.Exam Strategy
When dealing with inspection VPCs and Transit Gateways, always consider Appliance Mode if you suspect asymmetric routing is breaking stateful connections. Remember that dynamic routing (OSPF/BGP) is not natively supported by TGW attachments in the same way as VPCs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why doesn't Option C solve the problem?
Option C describes the goal (preventing asymmetric routing), but Option D provides the specific configuration (Appliance Mode) required to achieve that goal on an AWS Transit Gateway.
Can I use OSPF to fix this routing issue?
No, AWS Transit Gateway attachments do not support dynamic routing protocols like OSPF. Route propagation must be handled via static routes or BGP over Direct Connect.
Related Analysis
Practice All ANS-C01 Questions
Access 137 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full ANS-C01 Practice Test →