ACM Integration with ALB and Route 53
Short answer
A Request a public ACM certificate, configure the ALB to use it, and point the Route 53 Alias A record to the ALB.
Question
Which solution will meet this requirement?
Key Takeaways
This question tests the requirement for a public SSL/TLS certificate for a public-facing application and the proper Route 53 Alias record configuration for an ALB.
Securing a public-facing web application on AWS requires a public SSL/TLS certificate from ACM deployed on an Application Load Balancer, with Route 53 routing traffic via an Alias A record. This configuration ensures public clients trust the certificate and connect efficiently to the ALB.
Common mistake: Choosing a private certificate or attempting to apply ACM certificates directly to EC2 instances, ignoring that public certificates are required for public trust and can only be attached to load balancers or CloudFront distributions.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
A social media web application is inherently public-facing, requiring a certificate issued by a publicly trusted Certificate Authority so that end-user browsers do not show security warnings. AWS Certificate Manager (ACM) public certificates are designed exactly for this purpose and can be directly associated with an Application Load Balancer (ALB). In Route 53, configuring an Alias A record to point to the ALB is the AWS best practice, as it provides highly available and cost-free routing compared to a standard CNAME record.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Options B and C incorrectly use private certificates on the ALB, which would cause browser trust errors for public internet clients because private certificates are signed by a private CA. Option D unnecessarily complicates the architecture by attempting to configure a private certificate on the backend EC2 instances; while private certificates can be exported for EC2, the prompt does not require end-to-end TLS encryption. Furthermore, Option D uses a standard A record pointing to the ALB domain name (acting as a CNAME) rather than the preferred Alias record, which is less efficient at the zone apex.
Community Comment Notes
As Gramterre noted, "You need to present a certificate signed by a public authority to the web application clients." This reinforces that a public ACM certificate is mandatory for a public-facing application, and the Route 53 record must point to the ALB alias.
Official Reference
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/acm/latest/userguide/acm-services.html
This link opens the official vendor documentation in a new tab.
Exam Strategy
For public-facing applications, always select a public ACM certificate to ensure client trust. Remember that ACM public certificates cannot be directly installed on EC2 instances; they must be attached to supported services like ALB or CloudFront, which terminate the TLS connection.
Discussion 1 contributions
Compiled from public community threads and reader submissions, lightly edited for clarity. Handles and vote tallies are shown as recorded, and comments reflect the views of individual contributors.
From public community threads 1
-
Gramterre 👍 1Correct answer is A. You need to present a certificate signed by a public authority to the web application clients. The route53 record should point to the ALB Alias.
Reader comments & corrections
No reader corrections yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Related Analysis
Practice All ANS-C01 Questions
Access 137 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full ANS-C01 Practice Test →