Cisco ISE Components for Noncompliant Endpoint Enforcement
Which two Cisco ISE components enforce security policies on noncompliant endpoints by blocking network access? (Choose two.)
Community Insight
The exam tests whether you can distinguish between device identification (profiling) and compliance enforcement (posture), avoiding the trap of selecting licensing requirements as functional components.
This question tests the specific Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) components responsible for blocking network access to noncompliant endpoints, focusing on the distinction between profiling and posture.
Many learners select Apex licensing because it is a prerequisite for the Posture feature, but licensing is not a technical component that enforces policies; they also sometimes confuse Profiling with Posture.
Community Discussion (15 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
The correct options are Profiling and Posture agents. In Cisco ISE, Profiling identifies the type of device (e.g., iOS, Android, Printer) based on attributes like MAC OUI or DHCP fingerprints. If a policy requires devices to be compliant, ISE uses Posture Agents installed on the endpoint to assess its health (e.g., antivirus status, patch level). If an endpoint is identified via profiling but fails posture checks, or if it is a device type that cannot run an agent, ISE blocks access based on these combined inputs.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Apex licensing (Option A) is a license tier required to enable the Posture feature, but it is not a "component" that actively enforces security policies; it is an entitlement. TACACS+ (Option B) is used for administrative access control to network devices, not for endpoint network access enforcement. DHCP and SNMP probes (Option D) are passive monitoring tools used by the Profiler to gather data for classification, not for enforcing access blocks.Community Comment Notes
Community discussion is split between AE and CE. User Mjestic argues for A and E, stating "APEX licensing is needed to do Posture Compliance," which conflates requirement with function. User unclemonkeyboy correctly notes, "APEX licensing is required... But it isn't a component." User Silexis points out that "Profiling can be used to enforce compliance without posturing," highlighting that profiling itself can trigger access decisions based on device type, making C a valid answer alongside E.Exam Strategy
When asked for 'components' in Cisco exams, distinguish between software features/hardware parts and licensing/requirements. Always prioritize the active mechanism (Posture Agent) and the identification mechanism (Profiling) over the license that enables them.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Apex licensing not a correct answer?
Licensing is an entitlement or prerequisite to enable features, not a technical component that actively performs actions like blocking access.
Can Profiling enforce security policies alone?
Yes, Profiling can enforce policies based on device type (e.g., blocking all printers), even without Posture agents running on the endpoint.