AMP for Endpoints Simple Custom Detection List Configuration
A company recently discovered an attack propagating throughout their Windows network via a file named abc123456789xyz.exe. The malicious file was uploaded to a Simple Custom Detection list in the AMP for Endpoints Portal and the currently applied policy for the Windows clients was updated to reference the detection list. Verification testing scans on known infected systems shows that AMP for Endpoints is not detecting the presence of this file as an indicator of compromise. What must be performed to ensure detection of the malicious file?
Community Votes
78% of anonymous learners picked answer C. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
The question tests the distinction between file-based identification and hash-based detection in AMP's Simple Custom Detection lists.
This page explains why adding a filename to Cisco AMP for Endpoints fails and how using the SHA-256 hash ensures detection of malicious executables.
Many users choose Option B (Blocked Application Control) because they confuse blocking execution with detecting the file's presence, or they assume filenames work in custom detection lists.
Community Discussion (15 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Option C is correct because the Simple Custom Detection list in AMP for Endpoints operates exclusively on file signatures, specifically the SHA-256 hash. The scenario states the file was uploaded as 'abc123456789xyz.exe', which implies a filename entry. Since AMP requires the cryptographic hash to identify the indicator of compromise (IOC), uploading the SHA-256 hash is the necessary step to trigger detection.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A is incorrect because sending files to Threat Grid is for dynamic analysis and does not enable immediate static detection via the detection list. Option B is incorrect because Blocked Application Control is used to prevent execution, not primarily for detection/alerting of the file's existence in this context. Option D is incorrect because Advanced Custom Detections use regex patterns and are more complex; the Simple list is sufficient if provided with the correct hash.Community Comment Notes
Community consensus strongly supports Option C. As Makate noted, "Simple Custom Detection does not work with filenames. It only works with SHA-256 hashes." DWizard argued against C but was corrected by others emphasizing that detection requires the hash. Multiple users cited official Cisco documentation confirming that Simple Custom Detection lists rely on SHA-256 hashes for identification.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
Always distinguish between 'detection' (identifying an IOC) and 'prevention' (blocking action). For AMP Simple Custom Detection, remember it is hash-based (SHA-256), not name-based.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use a filename instead of a hash in AMP Simple Custom Detection?
No. The Simple Custom Detection list requires the SHA-256 hash of the file to identify the indicator of compromise.
What is the difference between Simple and Advanced Custom Detection?
Simple uses static file hashes (SHA-256). Advanced uses regular expressions and allows more complex pattern matching for detection.