OSI Layer for Network Traffic Monitoring
You have been called in to help with an investigation of an alleged network intrusion. After questioning the members of the company IT department, you search through the server log files to find any trace of the intrusion. After that you decide to telnet into one of the company routers to see if there is any evidence to be found. While connected to the router, you see some unusual activity and believe that the attackers are currently connected to that router. You start up an ethereal session to begin capturing traffic on the router that could be used in the investigation. At what layer of the OSI model are you monitoring while watching traffic to and from the router?
Community Votes
67% of anonymous learners picked answer A. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
The trap lies in confusing packet capture (Data Link) with router-based monitoring (Network).
This question tests the understanding of network forensics and the OSI model layers involved in traffic capture. The correct answer is A because the question asks about monitoring at the router level, which operates at Layer 3.
Many learners select C (Data Link) because they associate Wireshark/Ethereal with Layer 2 captures, ignoring the specific context of 'monitoring' via a router.
Community Discussion (4 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
The question specifies that you are monitoring traffic to and from a router. Routers are Layer 3 (Network) devices that operate based on IP addresses. While the tool (Ethereal/Wireshark) captures packets at the Data Link layer, the act of monitoring the flow of data as it traverses the routing infrastructure focuses on the Network layer where IP headers and routing decisions occur. The source key identifies A as correct, aligning with the device's primary operational layer.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option C (Data Link) is the most common distractor because packet sniffers inherently read frames at Layer 2. However, the question asks what layer you are monitoring while watching traffic in the context of a router investigation. Option B (Transport) deals with ports and protocols like TCP/UDP, which is higher than the router's main function. Option D (Session) is even higher and not relevant to basic router monitoring.Community Comment Notes
Comments show a split between A and C. One user argues for A by stating, "Capture takes place at data link, while monitoring takes place at whatever layer your target operates." Another user supports C, noting, "Capturing you do at datalink layer." The consensus leans towards A when considering the router's role in the OSI model.Exam Strategy
When questions mention routers or IP-based forwarding, think Layer 3. If they mention switches, MAC addresses, or raw frame capture on an endpoint, think Layer 2. Pay attention to whether the question asks about the tool's capability or the device's operational layer.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why isn't the answer Data Link if we use Wireshark?
Wireshark captures at Layer 2, but the question asks about monitoring via a router, which functions at Layer 3. The context shifts focus to the routing device's layer.
Does Ethereal capture at the same layer as monitoring?
Ethereal captures frames at Layer 2. However, 'monitoring' in a router context implies observing the IP traffic flow, which is a Layer 3 activity.