How to Fix Intermittent Connectivity Caused by FTD Proxy ARP
A network administrator is deploying a new Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) firewall. After Cisco Secure FTD is deployed, inside clients have intermittent connectivity to each other. When reviewing the packet capture on the Secure FTD firewall, the administrator sees that Secure FTD is responding to all the ARP requests on the inside network. Which action must the network administrator take to resolve the issue?
Community Votes
83% of anonymous learners picked answer B. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
The question tests identifying Proxy ARP behavior on a Cisco Secure FTD, where the common trap is assuming an access policy or transparent mode is needed to fix ARP issues.
When a Cisco Secure FTD responds to all ARP requests on the inside network, it causes intermittent client connectivity due to Proxy ARP. This page establishes that disabling incorrect Proxy ARP configurations in the NAT policy resolves the issue.
Choosing C (transparent mode) because of a misunderstanding of how FTD handles ARP in routed mode versus the actual cause, which is NAT Proxy ARP.
Community Discussion (6 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
When a Cisco Secure FTD in routed mode responds to ARP requests for IP addresses it does not own, it is performing Proxy ARP. This behavior is typically triggered by NAT rules where Proxy ARP is enabled by default on the destination interface. By reviewing the NAT policy and disabling the incorrect Proxy ARP configuration, the FTD stops intercepting ARP requests meant for other inside hosts, restoring normal connectivity.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Access policies (Option A) do not control Proxy ARP behavior, as ARP is a Layer 2 protocol handled before the access control policy evaluation. Converting to transparent mode (Option C) is an extreme measure that changes the deployment architecture and is unnecessary when a simple NAT configuration adjustment can fix the issue. Hardcoding MAC addresses (Option D) is an unsustainable administrative workaround that does not address the root cause of the FTD improperly answering ARP requests.Community Comment Notes
Commenters correctly identified the NAT policy's Advanced settings as the source of the problem, specifically noting the "Do not proxy ARP on Destination Interface" checkbox. One user incorrectly suggested transparent mode, arguing that "the issue is with inside client to client", but this ignores that the FTD is actively responding to ARP due to NAT, not blocking it. Another user mistakenly thought an access policy could control inside-to-inside ARP traffic.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
When FTD is responding to ARP requests for IPs it doesn't own, immediately suspect Proxy ARP caused by NAT rules. Look for options that modify NAT policy settings rather than changing deployment modes or access rules.