Cisco WLC AP Authentication for Rogue Containment
Short answer
A AP Authentication must be enabled so rogue containment does not act on RRM neighbor packets from friendly APs across separate RF groups.
Question
Key Takeaways
This question tests the specific Cisco WLC feature that stops RRM neighbor packets from friendly APs from triggering rogue containment; the trap is confusing it with generic AP security or a non-existent 'AP Wireless Protection Rules' feature.
In a multi-controller Cisco WLC network with separate RF groups, AP Authentication prevents rogue containment from acting on RRM neighbor packets sent by friendly APs. The correct protection type is AP Authentication (A).
Common mistake: Many candidates choose AP Wireless Protection Rules (B) because it sounds like a granular policy, but Cisco WLC does not offer a feature by that name; AP Authentication is the actual setting under Security > AP Policies.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
AP Authentication is the Cisco WLC feature designed to validate access points before they join the controller. When enabled, the controller checks the AP's pre-shared key or certificate. In a deployment with multiple controllers in separate RF groups, an AP associated to one controller may be seen by another controller as a rogue AP. However, if AP Authentication is enabled, the controller recognizes the AP as friendly and does not trigger rogue containment, even if it receives RRM neighbor packets. This matches the requirement that rogue containment be deployed on all controllers without affecting friendly APs, as confirmed by the Cisco 8.5 RRM configuration guide.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B, "AP Wireless Protection Rules," is not a valid Cisco WLC feature; the WLC has "Wireless Protection Policies" but no such rule set. Option C, "AP Security," is too generic and does not correspond to a specific setting that prevents friendly APs from being contained. Option D, "AP Access Control," refers to access control lists or authorization, not to AP authentication for rogue prevention. None of these options provide the mechanism that distinguishes authenticated APs from rogues.
Community Comment Notes
One commenter, 80b7716, correctly points to the Cisco 8.5 RRM guide as the reference and selects A. Another, rrahim, explains that AP Authentication ensures only authorized APs join the network, preventing rogue APs from connecting. largestyle questions where the term "AP Wireless Protection Rules" comes from, noting no source can be found. robi1020 argues for B as providing "more granular control," but this feature does not exist in Cisco WLC; the correct setting remains AP Authentication.
Official Reference
This link opens the official vendor documentation in a new tab.
Exam Strategy
When studying rogue detection and containment, memorize the exact Cisco WLC GUI terms: AP Authentication is under Security > AP Policies, while rogue policies are under Security > Wireless Protection Policies. In multi-controller scenarios, always consider how controllers authenticate APs across RF groups to avoid false containment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is AP Wireless Protection Rules not the correct answer?
How does AP Authentication prevent RRM neighbor packets from triggering containment?
Community Votes
75% of anonymous learners picked answer A. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Discussion 4 contributions
Compiled from public community threads and reader submissions, lightly edited for clarity. Handles and vote tallies are shown as recorded, and comments reflect the views of individual contributors.
From public community threads 4
-
80b7716 👍 2 Answered AA is correct: below is the reference https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/8-5/config-guide/b_cg85/radio_resource_management.html
-
rrahim 👍 1 Answered AIn a wireless network with multiple controllers and APs, AP Authentication is the appropriate protection type to ensure that rogue containment is deployed without being affected by RRM (Radio Resource Management) neighbor packets sent by friendly APs. AP Authentication ensures that only authorized APs are allowed to join the network, preventing rogue APs from connecting. AP Authentication verifies the identity of APs attempting to join the network, ensuring they are legitimate and authorized. This prevents rogue APs from being added to the network and ensures that RRM neighbor packets are only sent by trusted APs. Option B (AP Wireless Protection Rules): This is not a valid option for preventing rogue APs or managing RRM neighbor packets. Option C (AP Security): This is a general term and not a specific feature for this scenario. Option D (AP Access Control): This is not the correct feature for managing rogue containment or RRM neighbor packets. By enabling AP Authentication, the network ensures that only authorized APs are part of the RF groups, and rogue containment can be effectively deployed without interference from unauthorized devices.
-
robi1020 👍 1 Answered BOption B, AP Wireless Protection Rules, allows for more granular control over the behavior of APs, and it is often used to mitigate potential issues caused by the RRM neighbor packets without affecting the network's performance.
-
largestyle 👍 1Where is your source reference (book, URL etc) as I can find nothing relating to Cisco "AP Wireless Protection Rules"
Reader comments & corrections
No reader corrections yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.