Community Q&A

350-201 — frequently asked questions

Community-vetted answers to 8 common questions about this exam, each traced back to a specific practice question.

Questions from real practice questions

Each Q&A comes from a specific question — follow the link for the full analysis

Scoping a confirmed VPN intrusion: risk identification before containment

Why is blocking the source IP wrong when the attack is still in progress?

The attacker already has valid credentials, so the next VPN session can originate from any other IP address or proxy. An IP block delays one connection but leaves the credential and the installed remote access tool intact, so scope assessment must come first.

What should happen after identifying the systems and services at risk?

Once scope is known, the team resets or disables the compromised account, isolates the laptop, removes the remote access tool, then moves through eradication, recovery, and post-incident review, watching for lateral movement and data loss.

Does an antivirus scan have any role in this incident?

Yes, but later. Signature-based scanning often misses custom or living-off-the-land remote access tooling, so it should support endpoint forensics after scope is established rather than serve as the immediate next step.

The NIST Incident Response Step the Team Skipped: Containment

Why is removing malware not the same as containment in NIST SP 800-61?

Containment limits damage and stops the incident from spreading, such as isolating hosts or blocking C2 traffic. Removing the malware is eradication, a later sub-step that must not begin until containment is in place.

Where does a vulnerability assessment fit in the NIST incident handling life cycle?

It is not a formal phase. Hardening and gap remediation arise from post-incident activity (lessons learned) and ongoing vulnerability management, so it cannot be the 'missed step' in a NIST-based question.

What are examples of containment actions for a malware-infected host?

Network isolation or quarantine, disabling the host's network adapter, applying firewall rules to block command-and-control domains, and snapshotting the host for forensics before eradication.

Server Hardening Recommendations for Production Deployment

Why is disabling anonymous SID translation not always required?

It is primarily relevant to Windows Domain Controllers and Active Directory environments. For general server hardening across diverse platforms, broader controls like firmware passwords are more universally applicable.

What is the purpose of staging servers in a non-internet network?

Staging allows for testing and validation without exposing potential vulnerabilities to external threats. Once hardened and verified, the server can be moved to its final production environment.